The Great Indian Kapil Show on Netflix has landed in legal trouble after the makers of the cult classic Hera Pheri filed a ₹25 crore lawsuit. The controversy erupted when comedian Kiku Sharda impersonated the iconic Baburao Ganpatrao Apte, a character made legendary by Paresh Rawal in Hera Pheri. Producer Firoz A. Nadiadwala, who owns the rights to the franchise, claims the character was used without authorization.
This lawsuit has sparked debates about copyright, trademarks, and the limits of comedy in India’s entertainment industry.
What Triggered the Lawsuit?
- During a promo of The Great Indian Kapil Show, Kiku Sharda dressed up and acted as Baburao Apte.
- The character, famous for his catchphrases and comic timing, is one of the most recognizable in Bollywood.
- Nadiadwala alleges that the act infringes upon his intellectual property rights.
According to reports, Baburao is a registered trademark under the Nadiadwala banner, and any use without permission amounts to violation.
Legal Allegations
The notice cites:
- Copyright infringement under Section 51 of the Copyright Act, 1957.
- Trademark infringement under Section 29 of the Trademarks Act.
- Unauthorized commercial exploitation of an iconic character.
The lawsuit demands:
- ₹25 crore in damages.
- Removal of the Baburao skit from Netflix, YouTube, and social media.
- A public apology from Netflix and the show’s producers.
- An undertaking to never use the character again without approval.
Why Is Baburao So Iconic?
Baburao Ganpatrao Apte, played by veteran actor Paresh Rawal, is one of the most loved characters in Bollywood comedy. His quirky dialogues and unforgettable mannerisms in Hera Pheri (2000) and Phir Hera Pheri (2006) turned him into a cult favorite.
For many fans, Baburao is not just a character—it is a cultural phenomenon. This is why the unauthorized parody has become such a serious legal matter.
Netflix and Kapil Sharma Show’s Position
As of now, neither Netflix nor Kapil Sharma’s team has released an official statement on the issue. Legal experts suggest that:
- They might argue it was satire or parody, which sometimes gets protection under “fair use.”
- However, since Baburao is a registered trademark, the parody defense may not hold strong.
If proven guilty, the show may have to cut the segment, pay damages, or issue a formal apology.
Broader Implications
This case highlights a growing trend in Bollywood—character trademarks and copyright disputes. With franchises becoming billion-dollar properties, producers are taking stricter control over intellectual property.
It also sparks a debate: Should parody and comedy be restricted when dealing with iconic characters? Or should creative freedom allow comedians to experiment with pop culture references?
Conclusion
The ₹25 crore lawsuit against Kapil Sharma’s Netflix show marks a significant clash between comedy and copyright law in India. Whether the courts favor intellectual property rights or freedom of satire will be closely watched by the entertainment industry.
One thing is certain—Baburao Apte remains as relevant and powerful as ever, even 25 years after Hera Pheri first released.
About the Author
